the shack
The Shack and how God speaks to us
25/April/2010 07:49 PM Filed in: Faith and God
I recently reread Dr. Normal Geisler’s book review and critique of “The Shack.” The section below was of particular interest to me as this topic of “hearing from God” seems to something I’ve been bumping into a lot lately. Personally, I don’t need any special “revelation” or voice from God, because I already have one - a big one - the Bible. Every time I take even a small amount of time to study the limitless revelation from God, I’m spoken to by Him. Challenged, encouraged, rebuked, instructed, loved, guided.
The full article can be downloaded here. See tag on the sidebar for more on the Shack.
Problem Three: The Rejection of Sola Scriptura
The Shack rejects the sole authority of the Bible to determine matters of faith and practice. Rather than finding a Bible by the altar in a little old country church and getting comfort and counsel from the word of God, he is instructed to go to an empty shack in the wilderness with no Bible and get all he needs to cope with the tragedies of life from extra-biblical voices. The Shack’s author rejects what “In seminary he had been taught that God had completely stopped any overt communication with moderns, preferring to have them only listen to and follow sacred Scripture.... God‟s voice had been reduced to paper.... It seemed that direct communication with God was something exclusively for the ancients.... Nobody wanted God in a box, just in a book” (63).
However, the Bible clearly declares that “Scripture is God-breathed and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness, that the man of God may be competent for every good work” (2 Tim. 3:16-17, emphasis added). Indeed, our comfort is not found in extra-biblical revelations but is realized in that “through the encouragement of the Scriptures we might have hope” (Rom. 15:4). In short, the Bible is sufficient for faith and practice. No new truth beyond the Bible is needed for doctrine or living the Christian life. Of course, this does not mean that God cannot bring biblical principles to our minds when needed through various experiences, even tragic ones. He can and He does. Nor does it mean that God cannot guide in circumstances that help us in the application of biblical principles to our lives. He can and He does. But these experiences bring no new revelation. They are merely the occasion for God focusing our attention on the only infallible written source of His revelation, the Bible and the Bible alone.To forsake this fundamental principle is to leave Protestantism for Mysticism.
The full article can be downloaded here. See tag on the sidebar for more on the Shack.
Problem Three: The Rejection of Sola Scriptura
The Shack rejects the sole authority of the Bible to determine matters of faith and practice. Rather than finding a Bible by the altar in a little old country church and getting comfort and counsel from the word of God, he is instructed to go to an empty shack in the wilderness with no Bible and get all he needs to cope with the tragedies of life from extra-biblical voices. The Shack’s author rejects what “In seminary he had been taught that God had completely stopped any overt communication with moderns, preferring to have them only listen to and follow sacred Scripture.... God‟s voice had been reduced to paper.... It seemed that direct communication with God was something exclusively for the ancients.... Nobody wanted God in a box, just in a book” (63).
However, the Bible clearly declares that “Scripture is God-breathed and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness, that the man of God may be competent for every good work” (2 Tim. 3:16-17, emphasis added). Indeed, our comfort is not found in extra-biblical revelations but is realized in that “through the encouragement of the Scriptures we might have hope” (Rom. 15:4). In short, the Bible is sufficient for faith and practice. No new truth beyond the Bible is needed for doctrine or living the Christian life. Of course, this does not mean that God cannot bring biblical principles to our minds when needed through various experiences, even tragic ones. He can and He does. Nor does it mean that God cannot guide in circumstances that help us in the application of biblical principles to our lives. He can and He does. But these experiences bring no new revelation. They are merely the occasion for God focusing our attention on the only infallible written source of His revelation, the Bible and the Bible alone.To forsake this fundamental principle is to leave Protestantism for Mysticism.
|
The Shack - Now this book gets around
20/November/2008 12:47 PM Filed in: Faith and God
I was going to list some quotes from the text that send chills down your spine - but I’ll let you read them for yourself in the following reviews.
This one is short and Sweet by Hank Hanegraff
Tim Challies does a very in depth and balanced look at it. Check his site for many many other great reviews.
Thirteen Heresies in the Shack by Dr. Michael Youssef
10 minutes of thoughts about "THE SHACK" by Jason Robinson - a lot of stuff I never thought of
Chuck Coleson’s Review, Stay out of the Shack
Wretched Radio Resources - Three Different Reviews, including Geisler’s.
Mark Dricoll's take on the book's depiction of the Trinity.